In fact, is the jammer solution still a good solution?

Will cell phones soon have the same social status as cigarettes, as Anicet Mbida believes in his latest column?

Maybe. Anyway, let's point out again that as long as we agree to go where there is no coverage, as long as we only support network issues, weather or too many cell phone jammers, we should also accept being unreachable while watching a movie! ! !

Nonetheless, let's stick to the fact that an exhibitor who is able to provide a means of tranquillity to his audience implements the decree, which in the first place will protect him from polite dizzy and rude people rhymes with selfishness.

In the end, here's the problem, hardly anyone seems to be willing to give a real reason for this decree, and while the discomfort caused by some people's rudeness is real, it just hides another phenomenon associated with technological breakthroughs: hacking ! !

You're on the subway, on a train, in a restaurant, in any public place, there's nothing more unpleasant than being interrupted by an unconscious person who recounts his sad private life, giving orders or laughing, not even Tell us why.

So imagine that at a moment like this, the conversation is suddenly interrupted. That guy, that chick looked at his phone that had been muted and wondered what was going on, didn't understand anything. This kind of nonsense doesn't work after swearing.

Imagine that the person causing this disturbance is you... (or your neighbor).

this is possible.

All you need to do is have a jammer, which the Americans call a;GSM jammer;. It's illegal in the US ($11,000 fine), but in this country, the culture of vigilantes, of people who take the law into their own hands, is ingrained in bringing them in from abroad without hesitation. The New York Times recently revealed this in an interview…those who sell them from London or Mumbai.

The principle is simple: a signal jammer is powerful enough to prevent an adjacent cell phone from communicating with the antenna that connects the call. Small covers a few meters (starting at $50) and some companies buy fixed ones (from $1,000 to $4,000 or more) to ensure room, room, building tranquility.

Among users, we found a psychiatrist who was tired of being interrupted during therapy, a restaurant owner who no longer tolerated seeing phone calls constantly distracting staff, and a teacher who made sure their teaching was not interrupted by outsiders.

Incidental victims (those who did nothing wrong) can be numerous.

So, who is more unbearable, someone who can't control himself talking nonsense to bother you in public, or someone who is powerful enough to deprive himself of his right to restore order without considering the rights of others?